## Enzyme kinetics

Discussion of all aspects of biological molecules, biochemical processes and laboratory procedures in the field.

# The new Biology Online has arrived!

We are very pleased to announce the website's new design and features. As a biology website pioneer in 2001, it has grown to become the world's most comprehensive online database for biology terms and topics. Thus, we would like to invite you to take part in this significant milestone by checking out these latest features from Biology Online.

## Biology Dictionary

The largest online biology dictionary with over 70,000 biology terms! Learn various topics, concepts, and principles in biology. Start by searching here.

## Biology Articles

Get the latest biology news, insights, trends and discoveries in biology and other related research fields. We have over 5,000 articles you can choose from.

## Biology Tutorials

From the basics to the more advanced lessons, our tutorials will help you learn various topics in biology. Browse from over 100 free biology lessons here.

## New Biology Forum

We hold one of the largest discussion boards in biology online! Join our community by signing up here or log in here if you already registered with us before.

Thank you and we hope you will join us as the site continues to grow by leaps and bounds.

Sincerely,
Biology Online Team

blcr11
Viper
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:23 am

### Re: Enzyme kinetics

You are plotting the reciprocals of v and s, right? The data given here looks pretty linear when you plot 1/v on the y-axis vs 1/s on the x-axis. (Plotting the raw numbers of v vs s will give you a sigmoidal plot; not at all linear.) If you have a calculator that will do linear regression, enter your values of (1/s,1/v) as your (x,y) pairs. The slope of the regression will be Vm while the y-intercept is -1/Km. You can estimate them graphically if you prefer, but regression is a bit more accurate, plus you can estimate the errors in the parameters from the residual sums of squares - with a little math, anyway. Sometimes, the highest substrate concetrations (those at or near saturation levels) will give reciprocals that fall off the line. When that happens, you probably shouldn't use those data points to estimate the kinetic parameters. They won't be reliable.

blcr11
Viper
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:23 am
Sorry, that should be X-intercept = -1/Km, not y-intercept. And the slope is Km/Vmax not Vmax. Memory didn't serve me very well this time and I was too lazy to derive it from the rate expression-though that's a useful excercise if you've never done it before.

This link has a small, but straightforward graph of the rate law and the double-reciprocal (Lineweaver-Burk) plots.

setugoyal
Garter
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:32 pm
the ques is pretty simple in fact....
1/v=Km/(Vm[S]) + 1/Vm

so by plotting the 1/[V] by 1/[S] graph, we may find the intercept on y axis....which is 1/Vm in this case....and then do the reciprocal to find out Vmax.....and then put this value in the above equation.....at a particular [S] and v....and find the value of Km....

fengjili
Garter
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:18 am
i think you can use Origin to make [V]-[S] graph
then use “nonlinear fitting”and choose “Growth/Sigmoidal--Hil”
fix n=1,fit then you will get the Vmax and K