Search found 187 matches

by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:44 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate

Since this is a grown up forum, in order to show how simple and clear this is, I could suggest that instead, for the scenario, that my sister just had a "one-time thing" in a car back seat. He never became part of my family. She went outside and brought the gene into the family. Now you ca...
by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:30 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate

Biology Online says

a group of organisms of one species that interbreed and live in the same place at the same time (e.g. deer population)

And, they are not paradoxes. They are very nice syllogisms offering psychological novelty..
by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:14 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re:

Crucible, the fact that you make a definition, do not adhere to it and thus apparently create paradoxes, does not make you look smart. what are you talking about ? I adhere to my definitions. Show where, or stop making these continual accusations, please. If your population is your family, fine, gr...
by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:48 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Re:

It's not just genetic drift as caused by sampling. It's total removal of an allele from the population - and then back . But that is because your "population" is not a population. yes it is It is not reproductively isolated. Genes are coming from outside. No they're not. But here you seem...
by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:14 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re:

Crucible, I would add that using your family as a population in evolution is not a good idea. Because what generally constitute a population in evolutionary theory is a group of interbreeding individuals. So unless you want to tell us that your family has some generally frowned upon habits when it ...
by Crucible
Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:59 am
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Re:

... you have failed to provide a definition Untrue. As I explained, about this hitherto unexplored subject...this reversal of a trend of the frequency change, is de-evolution. [/quote]Since you offered a threat of possible action, you can now admit that you were wrong - once more. I did offer defin...
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:45 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Re:

There is no such thing as de-evolution. Evolution has no direction. and so neither would de-evolution ! ... you have failed to provide a definition Untrue. As I explained, about this hitherto unexplored subject...this reversal of a trend of the frequency change, is de-evolution. I will accept more ...
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:42 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate

Gavin wrote:So if both evolution and your devolution have no direction, what is it you're trying to say?
If evolution has no direction, then what are you trying to say ? Whatever you are trying to to say, I can say that same thing, too.
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:32 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re: Re:

Gavin wrote:
Crucible wrote:
canalon wrote:There is no such thing as de-evolution. Evolution has no direction.
and so neither would de-evolution !

Now you've got it!
Now you're noticing that I've got it !
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:13 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re:

canalon wrote:There is no such thing as de-evolution. Evolution has no direction.
and so neither would de-evolution !
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:11 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Why are flowers "beautiful"?
Replies: 114
Views: 128654

Re: Why are flowers "beautiful"?

At least you are recognizing that having receptors is not having a perception. I'm working on Jack to try to get that admitted.
by Crucible
Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:01 pm
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Evolutionists Show of Shutting Down the Debate
Replies: 71
Views: 57923

Re:

I would add that using your family as a population in evolution is not a good idea. Because what generally constitute a population in evolutionary theory is a group of interbreeding individuals. That's us, then. So it's agreed - it's evolution. Then de-evolution. One could only hope that you would ...