Search found 4 matches

by jennyellen13
Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:33 pm
Forum: Molecular Biology
Topic: central dogma
Replies: 14
Views: 9604

Re: DNA, RNA and Protein, what is more important?

sorry i didnt put in the central dogma. im thinking of doing protein as i think everybody will do DNA and i dont think theres a wrong answer its just a good argument, and i will argue that all are important to make them all work. ok so any good points on why proteins are more important for my argume...
by jennyellen13
Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:15 am
Forum: Molecular Biology
Topic: central dogma
Replies: 14
Views: 9604

im thinking DNA because its more stable than RNA so means it would last longer, even thought RNA does most the important work it would need DNA in the first place. does that sound about right? any arguments against that? or any arguments for that?
by jennyellen13
Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:57 am
Forum: Molecular Biology
Topic: central dogma
Replies: 14
Views: 9604

Re: DNA, RNA and Protein, what is more important?

thanks for you replies everybody, im still struggling on what one because there are three essay titles saying each of the three molecules so we can only choose one and talk briefly about the others in it. and my lecturer wants a good argument, its not all on the scientific stuff just a good argument...
by jennyellen13
Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:26 pm
Forum: Molecular Biology
Topic: central dogma
Replies: 14
Views: 9604

central dogma

hello everybody, as much help as poss please! for uni we have to write a essay on the one we think is most important, and argue why its important. im a bit unsure what one is, im between DNA and RNA but havent seen much about Protein!! i understand that DNA stores the information while RNA functions...