Teaching

... shows that it is the desire of many taxpaying Americans (at least the participants in the poll) to hear more than one side on this issue. Only teaching one scientific interpretation on origins without letting another scientific interpretation state it's case smack's of dogmatism. The problem ...

See entire post

If the original question was a biology text book question or othrwise related to teaching, I believe the correct answer is probably something fairly straightforward. Of course, the nature usually has dozens of "reasons" for everything, but maybe the two ...

See entire post

... at all in science. The lectures on where science cannot go, is what needs to go because it is another science-stopper. Be more class time spent teaching how things work by skipping the boring class lecture and discussion on a philosophy based political statement that does not help understand ...

See entire post

... real scientists detest. I have had my times where I doubted ever finding anything of a Creator through science and like Albert Einstein saw it as teaching religion a thing or two too, because it does. But none really miss the details that no longer make sense after knowing so we win, with in time ...

See entire post

I honestly believe that teaching the weaknesses of the evolutionary theory (there are probably some, like in any theory, though I don't know them) in high school would be a remarkably stupid thing. High school students don't know anything ...

See entire post