
|
|
Dictionary » P » Peer Peerpeer 1. To come in sight; to appear. So honor peereth in the meanest habit. (Shak) See how his gorget peers above his gown! (B. Jonson) 2. [Perh. A different word; cf. OE. Piren, LG. Piren. Cf. Pry to peep] To look narrowly or curiously or intently; to peep; as, the peering day. Peering in maps for ports, and piers, and roads. (Shak) As if through a dungeon grate he peered. (Coleridge) Origin: OF. Parir, pareir equiv. To F. Paraitre to appear, L. Parere. Cf. Appear. ![]()
Please contribute to this project, if you have more information about this term feel free to edit this page ![]()
Results from our forumRe: Why The Religious Minded Rule Science With Science... that it is easy to see they sure did not win any points hurling such poop. The rest of the scientific method I explain makes the best of all the peer-review possible to keep the theory getting stronger all the time. Some of the best ideas came from the Physics forum where along with the rest ...
See entire post
Re: Why The Religious Minded Rule Science With Science... from Gary! "I smell cheese. Or was that someone passing gas? Har!" Seriously delusional and needs to learn about the scientific peer-review process before he puts his foot in his mouth again! (()) Only a few more days until uaafanblog's next negative! <Max> Posted: May ...
See entire post
A myth of biology debunked... that are experts in that particular field. If they find the argument solid, then it gets labeled as "possibly true" and published in a peer-reviewed journal. This does not mean that false things don't get published - but this process was designed to make it so that at any one moment ...
See entire post
Any SOLID arguments against evolution?... they are the best we have yet been able to come up with. If you have a better theory, you are more than welcome to publish your findings in a peer-reviewed journal and share your discovery with the rest of us. As for Richard Dawkins, I think the man has a very exaggerated opinion of himself.
See entire post
Re: Natural selection is proven wrong... absolutely nothing at all to do with natural selection.. By "legitimate scientific source," I was thinking more along the lines of a peer-reviewed journal that is actually relevant to the topic of our discussion. Nature would be a good place to start, but there are plenty of others. ...
See entire post
This page was last modified 21:16, 3 October 2005. This page has been accessed 911 times. |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved.
Register | Login
| About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry