Dictionary » L » Large

Large

Large

1. Exceeding most other things of like in bulk, capacity, quantity, superficial dimensions, or number of constituent units; big; great; capacious; extensive; opposed to small; as, a nlarge horse; a large house or room; a large lake or pool; a large jug or spoon; a large vineyard; a large army; a large city.

For linear dimensions, and mere extent, great, and not large, is used as a qualifying word; as, great length, breadth, depth; a great distance; a great height.

2. Abundant; ample; as, a large supply of provisions. We hare yet large day. (Milton)

3. Full in statement; diffuse; full; profuse. I might be very large upon the importance and advantages of education. (Felton)

4. Having more than usual power or capacity; having broad sympathies and generous impulses; comprehensive; said of the mind and heart.

5. Free; unembarrassed. Of burdens all he set the Paynims large. (Fairfax)

6. Unrestrained by decorum; said of language. Some large jests he will make.

7. Prodigal in expending; lavish.

8. Crossing the line of a ships course in a favorable direction; said of the wind when it is abeam, or between the beam and the quarter. at large. Without restraint or confinement; as, to go at large; to be left at large. Diffusely; fully; in the full extent; as, to discourse on a subject at large. Common at large. See Common, Electors at large, representative at large, electors, or a representative, as in Congress, chosen to represent the whole of a state, in distinction from those chosen to represent particular districts in a state. To give, go, run, or sail large, to have the wind crossing the direction of a vessels course in such a way that the sails feel its full force, and the vessel gains its highest speed. See large.

Synonym: big, bulky, huge, capacious, comprehensive, ample, abundant, plentiful, populous, copious, diffusive, liberal.

Origin: f, fr. L. Largus. Cf. Largo.


Please contribute to this project, if you have more information about this term feel free to edit this page



Results from our forum


Re: Natural selection wrong due to transmission of harmful genes

... of odds, the average 35 year old woman has a 1 in 622 chance of developing breast cancer, while a 55 year old woman has a 1 in 33 risk -- quite a large difference.) -http://www.earlymenopause.com/breastcancer.htm And I'm sure if you poked around a bit you could probably see the average childbearing ...

See entire post
by futurezoologist
Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:23 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Natural selection wrong due to transmission of harmful genes
Replies: 2
Views: 25

Any SOLID arguments against evolution?

... there are limits to how living cells put things together. The question of valency was mentioned previously, and this in itself should allow a large percentage of those "possibilities" to be thrown out the window. Then take into account that cells do not just arrange atoms randomly ...

See entire post
by alextemplet
Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:50 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Replies: 100
Views: 1608

Natural selection wrong due to transmission of harmful genes

... at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, found such disorders accounting for more than two-thirds of all children admitted to a large full-service pediatric hospital over a one-year period. Moreover, regardless of reason for admission, children whose underlying disorder had a ...

See entire post
by gamila
Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:22 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Natural selection wrong due to transmission of harmful genes
Replies: 2
Views: 25

Re: Any other explanations other than Mutation?

... is part fin. Again mechanically and logistically IMPRACTICAL and improbable, which is usually the case for evolution. A very small percentage of large animals get fossilized because to fossilize something it has to be separated from the atmosphere so as to eliminate oxidation and other weathering; ...

See entire post
by futurezoologist
Sun May 31, 2009 1:42 pm
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Any other explanations other than Mutation?
Replies: 4
Views: 308

Re: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?

... would take vast amounts of time also, as your theory says. Being that evolution would take so much time it seems that the populations would get so large that there would be evidence of it in our crust, seeing they would overpopulate and then regulate through lack of resources, catastophe, or disease. ...

See entire post
by alextemplet
Sun May 31, 2009 1:23 am
 
Forum: Evolution
Topic: Any SOLID arguments against evolution?
Replies: 100
Views: 1608
View all matching forum results

This page was last modified 21:16, 3 October 2005. This page has been accessed 4,630 times. 
What links here | Related changes | Permanent link