
|
|
Dictionary » F » Forget ForgetForget 1. To lose the remembrance of; to let go from the memory; to cease to have in mind; not to think of; also, to lose the power of; to cease from doing. Bless the lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits. (Ps. Ciii. 2) Let y right hand forget her cunning. (Ps. Cxxxvii. 5) Hath thy knee forget to bow? (Shak) 2. To treat with inattention or disregard; to slight; to neglect. Can a woman forget her sucking child? . . . Yes, they may forget, yet will i not forget thee. (Is. Xlix. 15) to forget one's self. To become unmindful of one's own personality; to be lost in thought. To be entirely unselfish. To be guilty of what is unworthy of one; to lose one's dignity, temper, or self-control. Origin: Forgot (Forgat,); Forgotten, Forgot; Forgetting] [OE. Forgeten, foryeten, as. Forgietan, forgitan; pref. For- _ gietan, gitan (only in comp), to get; cf. D. Vergeten, g. Vergessen, Sw. Forgata, dan. Forgiette. See For-, and get. ![]()
Please contribute to this project, if you have more information about this term feel free to edit this page ![]()
Results from our forumPitfalls of Evolutionary Psychology: Exaptation... to would be the behaviors of intelligent beings. Finally, I ask you to consider genetic modification to humans that would affect behavior. Let's forget genetic modification for health or athletics for a moment. Let's forget about cybernetics and fusing computers with human beings. If a large ...
See entire post
Re: well never forget that we do have a lot of backups: for example one kidney is all you need to function perfectly normally. Evolution favored having two in case something happens to one of them, basically. Hmmh... that is very much ...
See entire post
efficiency of body cellswell never forget that we do have a lot of backups: for example one kidney is all you need to function perfectly normally. Evolution favored having two in case something happens to one of them, basically.
See entire post
The Colin Leslie Dean species paradox... form from a single individual which must have reproduced with something?" Which I've already answered in my Bird1.0 example. look i think you forget the things you say you have already admitted the bird1.0 is not a new species Your "first BIRD" would be my bird1.0 WITH THE DISTINCTION ...
See entire post
Genetics Problems... Friends i need ur help... recessive traits? c. is phenotypically like the second party? d. is genotypically like the second party? e. is heterozygous for all genes? Dont forget to explain me ..... i really appreciate. Thanks
See entire post
This page was last modified 21:16, 3 October 2005. This page has been accessed 920 times. |
© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved.
Register | Login
| About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry