Darwin charles

Maybe not necessarily big noses, but big nostrils. Bigger nostrils to breath more air in. You would need to breath more air if it contained less oxygen as it might have way back at the beginning of the neanderthal man. And like you stated, perhaps this dominant gene stayed within the gene pool for m...

See entire post

With no other intention than to get you to shut up, I've found something for you to read. Dang it, now you're making me wish we still had the Member Quotes thread! :)

See entire post

Gamila - while I've been largely ignoring everything you say; I couldn't help but notice you continue to emphasize the Cambrian explosion. With no other intention than to get you to shut up, I've found something for you to read. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC300.html please note that every...

See entire post

... is unfair to present the bishop as some kind of uneducated, close-minded, outdated neo-inquisition type (as the media often does) seeking to shut Darwin and Huxley down. He was most likely just as educated in science as they were. Again, the culture of the day saw many ministers and priests who ...

See entire post

In the Dover, PA case Judge Jones found that the ID theory the Discovery Institute tried to coherently explain could not "separate" itself from religious Creationism. I found that the theory was able to separate by accounting for the fossil evidence and all else without needing to mention ...

See entire post