Moderators: honeev, Leonid, amiradm, BioTeam
We are very pleased to announce the website's new design and features. As a biology website pioneer in 2001, it has grown to become the world's most comprehensive online database for biology terms and topics. Thus, we would like to invite you to take part in this significant milestone by checking out these latest features from Biology Online.
The largest online biology dictionary with over 70,000 biology terms! Learn various topics, concepts, and principles in biology. Start by searching here.
Get the latest biology news, insights, trends and discoveries in biology and other related research fields. We have over 5,000 articles you can choose from.
From the basics to the more advanced lessons, our tutorials will help you learn various topics in biology. Browse from over 100 free biology lessons here.
We hold one of the largest discussion boards in biology online! Join our community by signing up here or log in here if you already registered with us before.
Thank you and we hope you will join us as the site continues to grow by leaps and bounds.
Biology Online Team
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 9:37 pm
I cannot seem to grasp the idea of how I have to use probability in this problem:
"In Oslo 18121 school children were tested for colour blindess. These are the results:
Male: 8324 not colour-blind, 725 colour-blind.
Female: ? not colour-blind, ? colour-blind.
Determine the number of colour-blind females if colour-blindness is caused by a monogene recessive X-chromosomal gene."
My work so far:
Males from the parent generation can have the X^AY (not colour-blind) or X^aY (colour-blind) genotype. Females have X^AX^A, X^AX^a or X^aX^a (colour-blind) genotypes. However, I don't know how I need to combine these possiblities with the results for the male decendants. Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks in advance,