Fiber Disease Thread

[Jones]

This is a bad idea.

[tamtam]

censorship |ˈsensərˌ sh ip|
noun
the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts :

details of the visit were subject to military censorship.

[tamtam]

http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60s ... erance.htm

[mith]

Thank you for providing a link instead of repasting the website. I think we're making improvements here.

[tamtam]

[Jones]

Could someone please explain fully to me Fiber Disease? In there own words, in a manner that I can understand, because this all seems a little far fetched to me.

[mith]

Check the old thread. But you probably won't find a succinct explanation.

[tamtam]

moderator |ˈmädəˌrātər|
noun
1 an arbitrator or mediator : Egypt managed to assert its role as a regional moderator.
• a presiding officer, esp. a chairman of a debate.
• a Presbyterian minister presiding over an ecclesiastical body.
2 Physics a substance used in a nuclear reactor to retard neutrons.

the moderator still steered by utter conviction was apt to comment

[tamtam]

LESSONS FROM NAZI MEDICINE FOR STUDENTS AND PRACTITIONERS OF MEDICINE*
http://hgs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/conte ... act/5/1/73

Research on Human subjects
http://bioethicsanddisability.org/research.html

[canalon]

Tamtam,

poor victim of censorship you have been warned that your behaviour was not accptable, not because of what you said but because of how you said it and how you knowingly and repeatedly breach the rules of this site:
- You are promoting your theories, but consistently refused to provide any shred of evidence to subtantiate your claims
-you have made numerous very detailed claims that were challenged on existing science, to which your answer was simply repeating the claim without any more proof.
- you have been asked not to provide potentially dangerous "medical" advice on this board, but you come back and do it again. This is out of topic, and dangerous.
-The problem here is not freedom of speech, it is all about what this forum is for, what it is not. It is for healthy discussion about science in general, and biology in particular (the off topic forum is another story, this is the rec room of what is we hope an otherwise serious forum). It is NOT for unsubstantiated pseudoscience, advertisement for commercial products, treatments and other website.
-And before calling from freedom of speech, consider that it is not denied to you. You can go anywhere on the internet, and I will not chase you and try to silence you. But not on this board. This is the same as in many countries warranting freedom of speech. I cannot tell you not to say something, but I have all the rights to limit what you can say on my property (or one where I have rights to decide what can be said).

In conclusion quit posting your BS on this board, and leave alone the victim position, it is not what you are, just a convenient pose for the quack you are.

[tamtam]

Amice,

As far as I remember: one prerequisite is that participants not openly go into discussion with a moderator.


May I conclude that you deliberately promote the idea:
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without
any proof. (Ashley Montague)

"One note on the spot is more worth than a thousand recollections."

To objectify the matter, I took a copy of your response, and I will friendly ask the board to judge about it.

It is my absolute conviction that you only can suffer from opinion.

Yours sincerely,

tamtam

[canalon]

No, participants are welcome to discuss with moderators. But when participants make some claims not backed by science on a scientific board, and they ignore multiple demands of clarification, but use their claim to make further health recommandations, they are deemed dangerous and punished.

I am very afraid of your menace to call the other moderators, the admins (contact them by clicking on PM or here) or all the board to see my behaviour. A search on your username in the beginning of the "fiber disease thread" and your answers (or lack of it) to my polite request to provide further clarification about your claims would be really interesting...