
|
|
Age of ManModerator: BioTeam
32 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Age of ManGranted, the earliest fossil remains of humans date back some 180,000 years, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... 6_omo.html
But what if man is older? The creation of a fossil is a happenstance that rivals winning a lottery jackpot. Consider what must take place to preserve the bones of Granny the Cave woman. First, after an unwanted death, the body falls, and if the body is to be preserved, it must be covered quickly by mud and silt and become part of a sedimentary bed. Hopefully this bed of sand, silt and mud will receive enough compaction to become somewhat solidified. Now if granny is really lucky, water will flow though this sediment, and in the process permineralization http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/paleo/fossils/permin.html occurs to the bones, thus preserving them in time. As you can see, much must happen in order to preserve a biological specimen, so I challenge you statistic majors to compute the odds that human’s age are not far greater than known fossils. That reminds me, what about fossils that have yet been found. This is just one of my Hmm moments. -----Edit----- I just realized that I did not really state my point. I am willing to bet that man is older than fossil records indicate. Ok, that was my point
Makes a lot of sense, especially considering that early humans lived in an environment very poorly suited to fossilization.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
To be fair, no legitimate scientist claims that humanity is exactly as old as the oldest fossil; it would be more proper to state that humanity is "at least as old as" the oldest fossil. This is the rule in studying the past; something is obviously at least as old as the oldest evidence but may in fact be much older. Now the really perplexing question is, how much older do you think man might be?
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
How do you come up with that number and can you support it?
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
he said maybe. maybe not
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
I honestly don't see how that Noah's flood theory can be supported by evidence.
Generally speaking, the more people talk about "being saved," the further away they actually are from true salvation.
~Alex #2 Total Post Count
32 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee