Login

Join for Free!
17148 members


evolution

Discussion of everything related to the Theory of Evolution.

Moderator: BioTeam

evolution

Postby chenglorraine on Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:46 am

Can some brainy people explain to me how fossils provide evidence for the theory of evolution? :?
chenglorraine
Death Adder
Death Adder
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:09 am

Postby Schröder on Mon Dec 25, 2006 5:32 am

Just look at Cuvier works and you'd see why. At a particular area there are fossils. In a particular region rich with fossil material, you can notice that the deeper you go into the strata is the more dissimilar the fossilized organisms looked compared to the later strata. As a result of this, one can see evidence of gradual evolutionary change.

Also, in Darwin's voyage of the beagle, he observed fossils of ocean organisms high in the Andes mountains. This fossil evidence showed that there was an evolutionary change when land organism migrated to oceanic environments.
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one from so simple a beginning.....The Origin of Species
User avatar
Schröder
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Postby sachin on Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:49 am

And if some one doubt that; It might be occur that todays animal might not have got fossilised that time and so Evolution theory is wrong. :evil:

Then just note--- some live evidences are still presnt, and proved. :o

and if todays animal are direct product of a separate line from creation of life then where do remainants went/lose.??? :roll:
Nature Bangs On My Mind
User avatar
sachin
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:39 pm
Location: MUMBAI / INDIA

Postby Locus on Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:12 am

I think that fossils can not fully explane evolutionary process at all, becouse two things:
not all organisms become fossilised and it it's ocurre or not strongly depend by environment
it is extrimle hard to say about fossils what is ancestor and what is shot branch.
But at the lage distance of evolution second problem become less criticaly
Evolution will arrange everything
User avatar
Locus
Coral
Coral
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:03 pm
Location: Israel, Haifa

Postby sachin on Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:49 pm

Locus wrote:I think that fossils can not fully explane evolutionary process at all, becouse two things:
not all organisms become fossilised and it it's ocurre or not strongly depend by environment
it is extrimle hard to say about fossils what is ancestor and what is shot branch.
But at the lage distance of evolution second problem become less criticaly


I ve said that "Some might appear" e.g."locus" :lol:
Nature Bangs On My Mind
User avatar
sachin
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:39 pm
Location: MUMBAI / INDIA

Postby Schröder on Mon Dec 25, 2006 5:10 pm

I agree. To me the fossil evidence is a more classical evidence of evolution. Now with all the genetic evidence and DNA stuff, and comparing genomes....it's far more precise.
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one from so simple a beginning.....The Origin of Species
User avatar
Schröder
Garter
Garter
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago


Postby sachin on Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:35 pm

Schroder wrote:I agree. To me the fossil evidence is a more classical evidence of evolution. Now with all the genetic evidence and DNA stuff, and comparing genomes....it's far more precise.

You are right........
Nature Bangs On My Mind
User avatar
sachin
King Cobra
King Cobra
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:39 pm
Location: MUMBAI / INDIA


Return to Evolution

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron