
|
|
Living thingModerator: BioTeam
25 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
According to the definition of life, they are NOT living. But if you change the criteria of living things, they can be.. But they are non-living in the present situtation. We discussed this in the past you can make a search to read our discussion. It matters not how strait the gate
How charged with punishment the scroll I am the Master of my fate I am the Captain of my soul.
zami'87. if u want to know more abour virus click this link..they will help u http://www.biology-online.org/1/9_pathogens.htm, but its true virus are not living they have genetic material and stuff but in order for them to reproduse they need a cell
Summer schedual/ gotta cram all chemo info and i have water polo practice 3 tiomes a day!!!!!!!..frick i nned some sleep!!
Ok
is that link still working? I couldn't open the page. can you please check that adam00f?
It matters not how strait the gate
How charged with punishment the scroll I am the Master of my fate I am the Captain of my soul.
Yeah, i also, calling living or non-living is matter of convinience i believe that there is a level of livingness amd deadness of every organ even we are not 100% living and the PC is not 100% non living [ if u know REKI and etc u'll understand why] So, we should actually not defined life correctly . Prions , samilar case, but less living ness as no inheriance observed.
PS: this is complicated . ARe u boared ??? hrushikesh
2810712 i posted something similar- one of my first posts. I'm glad to see that there is someone that agrees with me
"I have no intention of stopping anytime soon. I want to understand the universe and answer the big questions, that is what keeps me going" - Stephen Hawking
We are made up of atoms and atoms are not living so you could say that we are made up of a bunch of dead things.
No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.
-Albert Einstein
I wouldn't say "dead", but rather "non-living"
right because dead means it was once living.
One of the great questions about life is whether life is simply the complex interactions between simple molecules, governed by the laws of chemistry and physics, or whether life is something imbued into these atoms. Without going into a metaphysical debate, I just want everyone to consider if all life is mechanical, how can something be judged "more living"? Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace; ~Niebuhr
Something that is metaphysical for 'modern' science today, can be physical later and that things may have been realized by ancient people. This is not impossible. So , don't neglect the metaphysical things, think upon and u may have a new discovery of yours.
hrushikesh
25 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee