Login

|
|
Beyond a ZooModerator: BioTeam
32 posts • Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
The point I'm making...that I've been making ever since this thread (and another thread by Inuyasha) started, is that it is impossible for a human to compare relative intelligences between organisms. Since we ourselves are organisms, we will always have extreme bias. The more like us an organism is, the more intelligent it appears to be to us.
What ifWhat if u ran a double blinded T test on both tested and testing subjected. U could list each of a certain creature's traits and have HUMANS decide which creature they are better off. But have the real experiment be a two sample T test....
It won't work....because in a human-designed test, the test would by design mark the more human-like organisms as more intelligent.
but in a double blind, although humans are the sample test takers they wouldn't know what they were testing. they can be given characteristics to choos their "favorite" traits and rank them.
but those choices would be biased, ok lemme give you an example
Animal 1: Can solve complex differential equations. Animal 2: Can peel a banana with it's foot. Animal 1: Can tell political jokes. Animal 2: Screeches in a number of funny octaves. Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace; ~Niebuhr
32 posts • Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee