Login

Successful parasiteModerator: BioTeam
14 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
I am gonna bump this up to kinda steal the thread.
I am new here, and on another forum I was in an arguement which revolved around the definition of parasite. More specifically, if a fetus met the definition. I content it does. But I am not a biologist. Nor, I think, were any of those who were arguing against the idea. In terms of the original question, I would agree that only B works. A would be a symbiot C would not be required, and would actually reduce the available food supply for itself and its species D would also be irrelavant. As I can tell, a parasite is defined only in its relationship to its host. That relationship being parasitic... A parasite need not even be a living thing. An air conditioner unit is parasitic to an automobile engine (where as an alternator is symbiotic). Since answering the original question is dependent upon how one defines what a parasite is.. I feel my tangent is worth discussing. Thanks.
14 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |

© Biology-Online.org. All Rights Reserved. Register | Login | About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us | Disclaimer & Privacy
Science Network - Braintrack.com - University Directory | Chemicool.com - Chemistry | EquationSheet.com - Equations | Logo design by LogoBee