1.
Lively CM: Migration, virulence, and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites.American Naturalist 1999, 153:S34-S47.
2.
Thompson JN: The geographic mosaic of coevolution.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
3.
Toju H, Sota T: Imbalance of predator and prey armament:geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection.American Naturalist 2006, 167:105-117.
4.
Benkman CW, Holimon WC, Smith JW: The influence of a competitor on the geographic mosaic of coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine.Evolution 2001, 55:282-294.
5.
Brodie ED Jr, Ridenhour BJ, Brodie ED III: The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts.Evolution 2002, 56:2067-2082.
6.
Hochberg ME, van Baalen M: Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients.American Naturalist 1998, 152:620-634.
7.
Minckley WL: Environments of the bolson of Cuatro Ciénegas: Coahuila Mexico with special reference to the aquatic biota.Volume 2. University of Texas El Paso Texas Science Series; 1969:1-63.
8.
Vermeij GJ, Covich AP: Coevolution of freshwater gastropods and their predators.American Naturalist 1978, 112:833-843.
9.
Hershler R: Systematic revision of the Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea) of the Cuatro Ciénegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico.Malacologia 1985, 26:31-123.
10.
Taylor DW: A remarkable snail fauna from Coahuila, Mexico.Veliger 1966, 9:152-228.
11.
Hershler R, Minckley WL: Microgeographic variation in the banded spring snail (Hydrobiidae: Mexipyrgus) from the Cuatro Ciénegas basin, Coahuila, Mexico.Malacologia 1986, 27:357-374.
12.
Tang CM, Roopnarine PD: Complex morphological variability in complex evaporitic systems: thermal spring snails from the Chihuahuan desert, Mexico.Astrobiology 2003, 3:597-607.
13.
Kornfield IL, Koehn RK: Genetic variation and speciation in New World cichlids.Evolution 1975, 94:427-437.
14.
Sage RD, Selander RK: Trophic radiation through polymorphism in cichlid fishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 1975, 72:4669-4673.
15.
Hulsey CD, Hendrickson DA, García de León FJ: Trophic morphology, feeding performance, and prey use in the polymorphic fish Herichthys minckleyi.Evolutionary Ecology Research 2005, 7:303-324.
16.
Kornfield IL, Taylor JN: A new species of polymorphic fish, Cichlasoma minckleyi, from Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico (Teleostei: Cichlidae).Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 1983, 96:253-269.
17.
DeWitt TJ, Robinson BW, Wilson DS: Functional diversity among predators of a freshwater snail imposes an adaptive trade-off for shell morphology.Evolutionary Ecology Research 2000, 2:129-148.
18.
Rundle SD, Bronmark C: Inter- and intraspecific traitcompensation of defence mechanisms in freshwater snails.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 2001, 268:1463-1468.
19.
Vermeij GJ: A natural history of shells.Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
20.
Trussell GC, Smith DL: Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2000, 97:2123-2127.
21.
Rundle SD, Spicer JI, Coleman RA, Vosper J, Soane J: Environmental calcium modifies induced defenses in snails.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 2004, 271:S67-S70.
22.
Kloeppel H: Molluscivore (Herichthys minckleyi) effects on snail (Mexipyrgus carranzae) densities and size in Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico.In Masters Thesis. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ; 2002.
23.
Edwards SV, Kot M: Comparative methods at the species level: Geographic variation in morphology and group size in grey-crowned babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis).Evolution 1995, 49:1134-1146.
24.
Hansen TF, Armbruster WS, Antonsen L: Comparative analyses of character displacement and spatial adaptations as illustrated by the evolution of Dalechampia blossoms.American Naturalist 2000, 156:S17-S34.
25.
Marko P: An intraspecific comparative analysis of character divergence between sympatric species.Evolution 2005, 59:554-564.
26.
Johnson SG: Age, phylogeography, and population structure of the microendemic banded spring snail, Mexipyrgus churinceanus.Molecular Ecology 2005, 14:2299-2311.
27.
Benkman CW: The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine.Evolution 1999, 55:282-294.
28.
Endler JA: A predator's view of animal color patterns.Evolutionary Biology 1978, 11:319-364.
29.
Storfer AJ, Cross J, Rush V, Caruso J: Adaptive coloration and gene flow as a constraint to local adaptation in the streamside salamander, Ambystoma barbouri.Evolution 1999, 53:889-898.
30.
Hargeby A, Johansson J, Ahnesjo J: Habitat-specific pigmentation in a freshwater isopod: adaptive evolution over a small spatiotemporal scale.Evolution 2004, 58:81-94.
31.
Palmer AR: Effect of crab effluent and scent of damaged conspecifics on feeding, growth, and shell morphology of the Atlantic dogwhelk Nucella lapillus (L.).Hydrobiologia 1990, 193:155-182.
32.
Trussell GC: Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator.Evolution 1996, 50:448-454.
33.
Trussell GC, David Smith L: Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2000, 97:2123-2127.
34.
Dillon RT: What shall I measure on my snails? Allozyme data and multivariate analysis used to reduce the nongenetic component of morphological variance of Goniobasis proxima.Malacologia 1994, 25:503-511.
35.
Madec L, Bellido A, Guiller A: Shell shape of the land snail Cornu aspersum in North Africa: unexpected evidence of a phylogeographical splitting.Heredity 2003, 91:224-231.
36.
Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, Olivier JM: ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software.Statistical Computation 1997, 7:75-83.
37.
Rosenberg MS: PASSAGE. Pattern analysis, spatial statistics, and geographic exegesis. Version 1.0.Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; 2001.
38.
Byers JA: Surface distance between two points of latitude and longitude.[http://www.wcrl.ars.usda.gov/cec/java/lat-long html] 1997.
39.
SPSS Inc: SPSS for windows. Rel. 11.5.2.1.Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2003.