..................................................
Fig. 1. Map of the study site on the east bank of the Ogeechee River, Georgia (from Darke and Walbridge, 2000, with permission).

..................................................
Fig. 2. The effects of artificial flooding treatments on soil P availability as measured by daily P supply rate to in situ AER bags in field mesocosms. Brackets indicate periods of flooding. (A) CF = continuously flooded; (B) PF = periodically flooded; (C) MC = mesocosm control; (D) NC = nonmesocosm control; (E) FD = flooded–drained; and (F) +P and (G) +N, flooded–drained treatments with nutrients added. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within a treatment (abc) (based on the method of least squares means with a Tukey adjustment [family error rate of P

..................................................
Fig. 3. The effects of artificial flooding treatments on resin-extractable Pi in field mesocosms. Brackets indicate periods of flooding. (A) CF = continuously flooded; (B) PF = periodically flooded; (C) MC = mesocosm control; (D) NC = nonmesocosm control; (E) FD = flooded–drained; and (F) +P and (G) +N, flooded–drained treatments with nutrients added. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within a treatment (abc) (based on the method of least squares means with a Tukey adjustment [family error rate of P

..................................................
Fig. 4. The effects of artificial flooding treatments on soil microbial P in field mesocosms. Brackets indicate periods of flooding. (A) CF = continuously flooded; (B) PF = periodically flooded; (C) MC = mesocosm control; (D) NC = nonmesocosm control; (E) FD = flooded–drained; and (F) +P and (G) +N, flooded–drained treatments with nutrients added. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences over time within a treatment (abc) (based on the method of least squares means with a Tukey adjustment [family error rate of P

..................................................