Influence of ancient glacial periods on the Andean fauna: the case of the pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo)
Daniel Cossíos1, Mauro Lucherini2, Manuel Ruiz-García3 and Bernard Angers1
1Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P.: 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, H3C 3J7, Canada
2GECM,
Cátedra de Fisiología Animal, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y
Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur-CONICET, San Juan 670, 8000
Bahía Blanca, Argentina
3Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cra 7A No 43-82, Bogotá DC, Colombia
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009,
9:68doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-68. [Open Access article]
Abstract
Background
While numerous studies revealed the major role of environmental
changes of the Quaternary on the evolution of biodiversity, research on
the influence of that period on current South-American fauna is scarce
and have usually focused on lowland regions. In this study, the genetic
structure of the pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo), a widely distributed felid, was determined and linked to ancient climate fluctuations on the Andean region.
Results
Using both mitochondrial sequences and nuclear microsatellites, we
inferred the existence of at least four groups of populations in the
central Andes, while other three localities, with little sample sizes
(n = 3), presented differences in only one of these markers. The
distribution of these groups is correlated to latitude, with a central
area characterized by admixture of numerous mitochondrial clades. This
suggests colonization from at least three glacial refuges and a contact
zone between 20 degrees and 23 degrees S following a glaciation event.
The similar coalescence times of the mitochondrial haplotypes indicated
that the major clades split approximately one million years ago, likely
during the Pre-Pastonian glacial period (0.80 – 1.30 MYA), followed by
a demographic expansion in every clade during the Aftonian interglacial
period (0.45 – 0.62 MYA). Interestingly, this structure roughly
corresponds to the current recognised distribution of morphological
subspecies.
Conclusion
The four groups of populations identified here must be considered
different management units, and we propose the three localities showing
differences in only mtDNA or ncDNA as provisional management units. The
results revealed the influence of ancient climate fluctuations on the
evolutionary history of this species. It is expected that the other
species of land vertebrates with a smaller or similar mobility have
been affected in the same manner by the glacial and interglacial
periods in the central Andes