1.
Coyne JA: Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila.Evolution 1983, 37:1101-1118.
2.
Eberhard WG: Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard Univ. Press: Cambridge, MA; 1985.
3.
Arnqvist G: The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies.Biol J Linn Soc Lond 1997, 60:365-379.
4.
Bond JE, Beamer DA, Hedin MC, Sierwald P: Gradual evolution of male genitalia in a sibling species complex of millipedes.Invertebr Syst 2003, 17:711-717.
5.
Hosken DJ, Stockley P: Sexual selection and genital evolution.Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19:87-93.
6.
Vilela CR: A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae).Rev Bras Entomol 1983, 1-114.
7.
Arnqvist G: Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection.Nature 1998, 393:784-786.
8.
Dufour L: Anatomie générale des Diptères.Annuaire de Science Naturelle 1844, 1:244-264.
9.
Pomiankowski A, Möller AP: A resolution of the lek paradox.Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1995, 260:21-29.
10.
Mayr E: Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Pess: Cambridge, MA, USA; 1963.
11.
Eberhard WG: Animal genitalia and female choice.Am Sci 1990, 78:134-141.
12.
Andrade CAC, Hatadani LM, Klaczko LB: Phenotypic plasticity of the aedeagus of Drosophila mediopunctata: Effect of the temperature.J Therm Biol 2005, 30:518-523.
13.
Arnqvist G, Thornhill R: Evolution of animal genitalia: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition-dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in a water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae).Genet Res 1998, 71:193-212.
14.
Preziosi RF, Roff DA: Evidence of genetic isolation between sexually monomorphic and sexually dimorphic traits in the water strider Aquaruis remigis.Heredity 1998, 81:92-99.
15.
House CM, Simmons LW: Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia.Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 2003, 270:447-455.
16.
Coyne JA, Orr HA: Behavioral and nonecological isolation in Speciation.Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts USA; 2004:231-232.
17.
Zeng Z, Liu J, Stam LF, Kao C, Mercer JM, Laurie CC: Genetic Architecture of a Morphological Shape Difference Between Two Drosophila Species.Genetics 2001, 54:299-310.
18.
Maggenti AR, Gardner S: Online Dictionary of Invertebrate Zoology: Complete Work.[http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/onlinedictinvertzoology/2] University of Nebraska – Lincoln; 2005.
19.
Wasserman M: Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group.In Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. Edited by: Krimbas CB, Powell JR. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL; 1992:455-552.
20.
Ruiz A, Wasserman M: Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex.Heredity 1993, 70:582-596.
21.
Fanara JJ, Fontdevila A, Hasson E: Oviposition preference, viability, developmental time and body size in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural hosts.Evol Ecol 1999, 13:173-190.
22.
Naveira H, Fontdevila A: The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii XII. The genetic basis of sterility in hybrids between D. buzzatii its sibling D. serido from Argentina.Genetics 1986, 114:841-857.
23.
Fontdevila A, Pla C, Hasson E, Wasserman M, Sanchez A, Naveira H, Ruiz A: Drosophila koepferae new member of the Drosophila serido (Diptera, Drosophilidae) superspecies taxon.Ann Entomol Soc Am 1988, 81:380-385.
24.
Hasson E, Fanara JJ, Rodríguez C, Vilardi JC, Reig OA, Fontdevila A: The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXIV: Second chromosome inversions have different average effect on thorax length.Heredity 1992, 68:557-563.
25.
Marín I, Fontdevila A: Stable Drosophila buzzati-Drosophila koepferae hybrids.J Hered 1998, 89:336-339.
26.
Gómez GA, Hasson E: Transpecific polymorphisms in an inversion linked esterase locus in Drosophila buzzatii.Mol Biol Evol 2003, 20:410-423.
27.
Piccinali R, Aguadé M, Hasson E: Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae.Mol Biol Evol 2004, 21:141-152.
28.
Hasson E, Rodríguez C, Fanara JJ, Naveira H, Reig OA, Fontdevila A: Macrogeographic patterns in the inversion polymorphisms of Drosophila buzzatii in New World populations.J Evol Biol 1995, 8:369-384.
29.
Fanara JJ, Hasson E, Rodriguez C, Santos M, Fontdevila A: Are Opuntia hosts a selective factor for the inversion polymorphism?Heredity 1996, 77:500-508.
30.
David JR, Gibert P, Legout H, Pétavy G, Capy P, Moreteau B: Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations.Heredity 2005, 94:3-12.
31.
Marín I, Ruiz A, Pla C, Fontdevila A: Reproductive relationships among ten species of the Drosophila repleta group from South America from the West Indies.Evolution 1993, 47:1616-1624.
32.
Ruiz A, Cansian AM, Kuhn GC, Alves MA, Sene FM: The Drosophila serido speciation puzzle: putting new pieces together.Genetica 2000, 108(3):217-227.
33.
Manfrin MH, Sene FM: Cactophilic Drosophila in South America: A Model for Evolutionary Studies.Genetica 2006, 126:57-75.
34.
Manfrin MH, de Brito ROA, Sene FM: Systematics and Evolution of the Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Cluster Using mtDNA.Ann Entomol Soc Am 2001, 94:333-346.
35.
Conner JK, Hartl DL: A primer of ecological genetics.Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Mass USA; 2004:138.
36.
Robertson FW: Studies in quantitative genetics. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster.J Genet 1957, 55:428-443.
37.
Roff D: Dispersal in Dipterans: its costs and consequences.J Anim Ecol 1977, 46:443-456.
38.
Hasson E, Fanara JJ, Rodriguez C, Vilardi J, Reig OA, Fontdevila A: The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXVII. Thorax length is positively correlated with longevity in a natural population from Argentina.Genetica 1993, 92:61-65.
39.
Fanara JJ, Mensch J, Folguera G, Hasson E: Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts.Evol Ecol 2004, 18:203-214.
40.
Fanara JJ, Folguera G, Fernández Iriarte P, Mensch J, Hasson E: Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila.J Evol Biol 2006, 19(3):900-908.
41.
Carreira VP, Soto IM, Hasson E, Fanara JJ: Patterns of variation in wing morphology in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii and its sibling D. koepferae.J Evol Biol 2006, 9(4):1275-1282.
42.
Santos M, Ruiz A, Barbadilla A, Quezada-Díaz JE, Hasson E, Fontdevila A: The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XlV. Larger flies mate more often in nature.Heredity 1988, 61:255-262.
43.
Santos M, Ruiz A, Quezada-Diaz JE, Barbadilla A, Fontdevila A: The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size.J Evol Biol 1992, 5:403-422.
44.
Norry FM, Vilardi JC, Fanara JJ, Hasson E: Courtship success and multivariate analysis of sexual selection on morphometric traits in Drosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae).Journal of Insect Behaviour 1995, 8:219-229.
45.
Bundgaard J, Barker JSF: Remating, sperm transfer, and sperm displacement in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii Patterson & Wheeler (Diptera: Drosophilidae).Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2000, 71(20):145-164.
46.
Bertin A, Fairbairn DJ: One tool, many uses: precopulatory sexual selection on genital morphology in Aquarius remigis.J Evol Biol 2005, 18(4):949-961.
47.
Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC: Genetic Analysis of a Morphological Shape Difference in the Male Genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.Genetics 1996, 142:1129-1145.
48.
Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS: A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia.J Evol Biol 2006, 19(4):1058-1070.
49.
Alibert P, Auffray JC: Genomic coadaptation, outbreeding depression, and developmental stability.In Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences. Edited by: Polak M. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2003:116-134.
50.
Hey J, Kliman RM: Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex.Mol Biol Evol 1993, 10:804-822.
51.
Lemeunier F, Ashburner M: Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences.Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci 1976, 193:275-294.
52.
Fernández Iriarte P, Hasson E: The role of the use of different host plants in the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii.Evolution 2000, 54:1295-1302.
53.
Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J: Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:12084-12088.
54.
Rieseberg LH: Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation.Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:351-358.
55.
Rohlf FJ: TpsDig, v 1.31 Free software.[http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html] 2001.
Ecology & Evolution, SUNY, Stony Brook
56.
Kuhl FP, Giardina CR: Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour.Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1982, 18:236-258.
57.
Iwata H, Ukai Y: SHAPE: A Computer Program Package for Quantitative Evaluation of Biological Shapes Based on Elliptic Fourier Descriptors.J Hered 2002, 93:384-385.
58.
Ferson S, Rohlf FJ, Koehn RK: Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines.Syst Zool 1985, 34:59-68.
59.
Rohlf FJ: Fitting curves to outlines.In Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop Edited by: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL. 1990, 167-177.
60.
Lestrel PE: Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology.Cambridge University Press. UK; 1997:480.
61.
Rohlf FJ, Archie JW: A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).Systematic Biology 1984, 33:302-317.
62.
Soto I: Use of elliptic Fourier descriptors for quantification of male genitalia morphology.Drosoph Inf Serv 2005, 88:42-45.
63.
StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6[http://www.statsoft.com] 2001.
Answers to all your Biology Questions
