Time and communication are important aspects of the medical consultation.

• Abstract
• Background
• Methods
• Results
• Discussion and conclusion
• Competing interests
• References
• Figure
• Tables

Biology Articles » Bioethics » Ethics takes time, but not that long » References

References

- Ethics takes time, but not that long

1. Ley P: Communication with patients. Improving communication, satisfaction and compliance.London: Chapman & Hall; 1988.

2. Kennedy P, Llewelyn S: The person's experience of health care.In Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology. Edited by: Llewelyn S, Kennedy P. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003:21-40.

3. Veatch RM: A Theory of Medical Ethics.New York: Basic Books; 1981.

4. Brody BA: The Ethics of Biomedical Research.In An International Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

5. Hansson MG: Balancing the quality of consent.

   J Med Ethics 1998, 24:182-7.

6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fourth edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

7. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlson JA, Helgesson G: Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

   Lancet Oncol 2006, 7:266-9.

8. Guadagnoli E, Ward P: Patient participation in decision-making.

   Soc Sci Med 1998, 47:329-39.

9. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M: Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

   Behav Med 1998, 24:81-8.

10. Rodriguez A, Tuvemo T, Hansson MG: Parents' perspectives on research involving children.

    Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 2006, 111:73-86.

11. Beardsmore CS: Ethical issues in lung function testing in children.

    Paediatr Respir Rev 2000, 1:342-6.

12. Wright SM, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Howard DM, Brancati FL: Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.

    N Engl J Med 1998, 31;339(27):1986-93.

13. Coldicott Y, Pope C, Roberts C: The ethics of intimate examinations-teaching tomorrow's doctors.

    BMJ 2003, 326(7380):97-101.

14. Mishna F, Antle BJ, Regehr C: Tapping the perspectives of children: emerging ethical issues in qualitative research.

    Qualitative Social Work 2004, 3(4):449-68.

15. Wendler D, Belsky L, Thompson KM, Emanuel EJ: Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard. Implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.

    JAMA 2005, 294:826-832.

16. Berg A, Herb A, Hurst M: Cochlear implants in children: ethics, informed consent, and parental decision making.

    J Clin Ethics 2005, 16:239-50.

17. Burke TM, Abramovitch R, Zlotkin S: Children's understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research.

    J Med Ethics 2005, 31(12):715-20.

18. Olechnowicz JQ, Eder M, Simon C, Zyzanski S, Kodish E: Assent observed: children's involvement in leukemia treatment and research discussions.

    Pediatrics 2002, 109(5):806-14.

19. Erb TO, Schulman SR, Sugarman J: Permission and assent for clinical research in pediatric anesthesia.

    Anesth Analg 2002, 94(5):1155-60.

20. Ondrusek N, Abramovitch R, Pencharz P, Koren G: Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research.

    J Med Ethics 1998, 24(3):158-65.

21. Walker-Andrews A: Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information.

    Psychol Bull 1997, 121:437-56.

22. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD: Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review.

    J Am Board Fam Pract 2002, 15:25-38.

23. Sloane PD, Beck R, Kowlowitz V, Blotzer AM, Wang L, Akins L, et al.: Behavioral coding for evaluation of medical student communication: clarification or obfuscation?

    Acad Med 2004, 79:162-70.

24. Schattner A, Bronstein A, Jellin N: Information and shared decision-making are top patients' priorities.

    BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:21.

25. Wanzer MB, Booth-Butterfield M, Gruber K: Perceptions of health care providers' communication: relationships between patient-centered communication and satisfaction.

    Health Commun 2004, 16(3):363-83.

26. Taylor SE: Health Psychology. 4th edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

27. Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF, Langer S, Haist SA: House staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction.

    J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:170-4.

28. Musschenga AW: Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.

    J Med Philos 2005, 30(5):467-90.

29. Molewijk B, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J: Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics.

    Med Health Care Philos 2004, 7(1):55-69.

30. Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J: Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review.

    Fam Pract 1998, 15(5):480-92.