The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and developments …

• Abstract
• Background
• Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Limitations
• Conclusion
• References
• Figure
• Tables

Biology Articles » Bioethics » An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan » References

References

- An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan

1. Aulsio MP: Ethics Committees and Ethics Consultation.In Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd edition. Edited by: Post SG. Macmillan Reference: USA, New York; 2004:841-847.

2. Levine RJ: Research Ethics Committees.In Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd edition. Edited by: Post SG. Macmillan Reference: USA, New York; 2004:2311-2316.

3. U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Beahviral Research: Report and Recommendation: Institutional Review Boards.U.S. Government Printing Office: USA, Washington D.C; 1978.

4. World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

   1964. (revised 1975, 2000).

5. Dal-Re R, Espada J, Ortega R: Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applicants for clinical trial protocols on medicines.

   J Med Ethics 1999, 25:268-73.

6. Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F: The activity of French Research Ethics Committees and characteristics of biomedical research protocols involving humans: a retrospective cohort study.

   BMC Medical Ethics 2005, 6:9.

7. Goodyear-Smith F, Lobb B, Davies G, Nachson I, Seelau SM: International variation in ethics committee requirements: comparison across five Westernized nations.

   BMC Medical Ethics 2002, 3:2.

8. Hearnshaw H: Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study.

   BMJ 2004, 328:140-1.

9. Hyder AA, Wali SA, Khan AN, Teoh NB, Kass NE, Dawson L: Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers.

   J Med Ethics 2004, 30(1):68-72.

10. Kim OJ, Park BJ, Sohn DR, Lee SM, Shin SG: Current status of the institutional review boards in Korea: constitution, operation, and policy for protection of human research participants.

    J Korean Med Sci 2003, 18(1):3-10.

11. McGee G, Caplan AL, Spanogle JP, Asch DA: A national study of ethics committees.

    American Journal of Bioethics 2001, 1(4):60-64.

12. McNeill PM: A critical analysis of Australian clinical ethics committees and the functions they serve.

    Bioethics 2001, 15(5 6):443-60.

13. Redshaw ME, Harris A, Baum JD: Research ethics committee audit: differences between countries.

    J Med Ethics 1996, 22:78-82.

14. Rikkert O, Lauque LF, Vellas B, Dekkers W: The practice of obtaining approval from medical research ethics committees: a comparison within 12 European countries for a descriptive study on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's dementia.

    European Journal of Neurology 2005, 12:212-7.

15. Saito T: Ethics committees in Japanese medical schools.

    HEC Forum 1992, 4(4):281-7.

16. Wenger NS, Golan O, Shalev C, Glick S: Hospital ethics committees in Israel: structure, function and heterogeneity in the setting of statutory ethics committees.

    J Med Ethics 2002, 28(3):177-82.

17. Slowther A, Bunch C, Woolnough B, Hope T: Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK.

    J Med Ethics 2001, 27(suppl I):i2-i8.

18. Slowther A, Johnston C, Goodall J, Hope T: Development of clinical ethics committees.

    BMJ 2004, 328(7445):950-2.

19. Larcher V, Lask B, McCarthy J: Paediatrics at the cutting edge: do we need ethics committees?

    J Med Ethics 1997, 23:245-9.

20. Slowther A, Underwood M: Is there a need for a clinical ethics support service in the UK?

    J Med Ethics 1998, 24:207.

21. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare: Report on Survey of Medical Care Institutions.

    1996. (in Japanese)

22. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare: Report on Survey of Medical Care Institutions.

    2002. (in Japanese)

23. Slingsby BT, Nagao N, Akabayashi A: Administrative Legislation in Japan: Guidelines on Scientific and Ethical Standards.

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2004, Summer;13(3):245-53.

24. Kerrison S, Pollock AM: The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the baby water?

    J Med Ethics 2005, 31:487-9.

25. Fukatsu N, Akabayashi A, Kai I: The current status of ethics committees and decision making procedures in general hospitals in Japan.

    Journal of Japan Association for Bioethics 1997, 7(1):130-135. (in Japanese)

26. Hirose M, Imanaka Y, Ishizaki T, Evans E: How can we improve the quality of health care in Japan? Learning from JCQHC hospital accreditation.

    Health Policy 2003, 66(1):29-49.

27. Hoshino K: The Liaison Society for Ethics Committees of Medical Schools in Japan.

    Camb Q Healthc Ethics 1992, Spring;1(2):179.

28. Slingsby BT, Kodama S, Akabayashi A: Scientific Misconduct in Japan: The Present Paucity of Oversight Policy.

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2006, 15(3):294-7.