The authors discuss notable similarities of paragnath anlagen to those of the …

• Cell lineage analysis of the mandibular segment of the amphipod Orchestia cavimana reveals that the crustacean paragnaths are sternal outgrowths and not limbs
• Background
• Results
• Discussion and conclusion
• References

Biology Articles » Zoology » Cell lineage analysis of the mandibular segment of the amphipod Orchestia cavimana reveals that the crustacean paragnaths are sternal outgrowths and not limbs » References

References

- Cell lineage analysis of the mandibular segment of the amphipod Orchestia cavimana reveals that the crustacean paragnaths are sternal outgrowths and not limbs

1. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD: The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence.

   Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216:395-415. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

   Return to text

2. Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD: Heads, Hox and the phylogenetic position of trilobites.In Crustacea and arthropod relationships. Edited by: Koenemann S, Jenner RA. Boca Raton , CRC; Taylor & Francis; 2005:139-165.

   Return to text

3. Kimm MA, Prpic NM: Formation of the arthropod labrum by fusion of paired and rotated limb-bud-like primordia.

   Zoomorphology 2005, 125:147-155. Publisher Full Text |

   Return to text

4. Gruner HE: 1. Klasse Crustacea.In Lehrbuch der speziellen Zoologie. Volume Band 1: Wirbellose Tiere, 4. Teil: Arthropoda (ohne Insecta). Edited by: Gruner HE. Jena , Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1993.

   Return to text

5. Bitsch C, Bitsch J: The phylogenetic interrelationships of the higher taxa of apterygote hexapods.

   Zool Scr 2000, 29(1):131-156. Publisher Full Text |

   Return to text

6. Cannon HG, Leak FMC: Appendix on the mouth parts of the Branchiopoda.

   Proc R Soc London B 1933, 222:340-352.

   Return to text

7. Giesbrecht W: II. Klasse: Crustacea.In Handbuch der Morphologie der wirbellosen Tiere. Volume 4. Edited by: Lang A. Jena , Gustav Fischer; 1913.

   Return to text

8. Olesen J: External morphology and larval development of Derocheilocaris remanei Delamare-Deboutteville & Chappuis, 1951 (Crustacea, Mystacocarida), with a comparison of crustacean segmentation and tagmosis pattern.

   Biol Skr, Kong Dan Videnskab Selskab 2001, 53:1-59.

   Return to text

9. Sanders HL: The Cephalocarida. Functional morphology, larval development, comparative external morphology.

   Mem Connet Acad Art Sci 1963, 15:1-80.

   Return to text

10. Walossek D: The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea.

    Foss Strat 1993, 32:1-202.

    Return to text

11. Schram FR: Crustacea.New York, Oxford , Oxford Press; 1986:1-606.

    Return to text

12. Claus C: Neue Beiträge zur Morphologie der Crustaceen.

    Arb Zool Inst Wien 1886, 6:1-108 plus plates.

    Return to text

13. Richter S: The mouthparts of two lophogastrids, Chalaraspidum alatum and Pseudochalaraspidum hanseni (Lophogastrida, Peracarida, Malacostraca), including some remarks on the monophyly of the Lophogastrida.

    J Nat Hist 2003, 37:2773-2786. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

14. Abzhanov A, Kaufman TC: Homeotic genes and the arthropod head: Expression patterns of the labial, proboscipedia, and Deformed genes in crustaceans and insects.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96(18):10224-10229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text |

    Return to text

15. Walossek D: Cambrian 'Orsten'-type arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea: Athen. Edited by: Legakis A. Pensoft Publishers; 2003:67-84.

    Return to text

16. Abzhanov A, Kaufman TC: Hox genes and tagmatization of the higher Crustacea (Malacostraca).In Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Crustacea. Edited by: Scholtz G. Lisse , A.A.Balkema; 2004:43-71.

    Return to text

17. Ungerer P, Wolff C: External morphology of limb development in the amphipod Orchestia cavimana (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida).

    Zoomorphology 2005, 124:89-99. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

18. Alwes F, Scholtz G: Stages and other aspects of the embryology of the parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (Decapoda, Reptantia, Astacida).

    Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216:169-184. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

19. Tiegs OW: The embryology and affinities of the Symphyla based on a study of Hanseniella agilis.

    Quart J Microsc Sci 1940, 82(1):3-225 plus plates.

    Return to text

20. Kraus O, Kraus M: Phylogenetic system of the Tracheata (Mandibulata): on "Myriapoda" - Insecta interrelationships, phylogenetic age and primary ecological niches.

    Verh naturwiss Ver Hamburg (NF) 1994, 34:5-31.

    Return to text

21. Dohle W: Sind die Myriapoden ein monophyletische Gruppe?

    Abh naturwiss Ver Hamburg 1980, 23 (NF):45-104.

    Return to text

22. Matsuda R: Morphology and evolution of the insect head.In Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute. Volume 4. Ann Arbor, Michigan ; 1965:1-334.

    Return to text

23. Rogers BT, Kaufman TC: Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila.

    Int Rev Cyt 1997, 174:1-84.

    Return to text

24. Rohrschneider I: Beiträge zur Entwicklung des Vorderkopfes und der Mundregion von Periplaneta americana.

    Zool Jb Anat 1968, 85:537-578.

    Return to text

25. Larink O: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Petrobius brevistylis (Thysanura, Insecta).

    Helgol Mar Res 1969, 19:111-155.

    Return to text

26. Chaudonneret J: Le système nerveux de la région gnathale de l´écerevisse Cambarus affinis (Say).

    Ann des Sc Nat, Zool 1956, 11:33-61.

    Return to text

27. Crampton GC: The origin and homologies of the so-called "superlinguae" or "paraglossae" (paragnaths) of insects and related arthropods.

    Psyche 1921, 28(3):84-92.

    Return to text

28. Hansen HJ: Zur Morphologie der Gliedmaßen und Mundtheile bei Crustaceen und Insecten.

    Zool Anz 1893, 16:193-212.

    Return to text

29. Casanova JP: Gnathophausia childressi, new species, a mysid from deep near-bottom waters off california, with remarks on the mouthparts of the genus Gnathophausia.

    J Crust Biol 1996, 16(1):192-200. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

30. Claus C: Zur Kenntniss des Baues und der Entwicklung von Branchipus stagnalis und Apus cancriformes.

    Abhandl Königl Ges Wiss Göttingen 1873, 18:1-48 plus plates.

    Return to text

31. Stoll E: Über den Bau des Zentralnervensystems von Astacus fluviatilis (Potamobius astacus L.).

    Z wiss Zool 1925, 126:145-179.

    Return to text

32. Lauterbach KE: Zum Grundplan der Crustacea.

    Verh naturwiss Ver Hamburg 1986, 28:27-63.

    Return to text

33. Mc Murrich JP: Embryology of the isopod Crustacea.

    J Morph 1895, 11:63-154 plus pates. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

34. Denis JR: Etudes sur l'anatomie de la tête des quelques Collemboles suivies de considérations sur la morphologie de la tête des Insectes.

    Arch Zool Exp Gén 1928, 58:1-291.

    Return to text

35. Laverack MS: The nervous system of the Crustacea, with special reference of the sensory system.In Nervous Systems in Invertebrates. Volume Series A: Life Sciences, Volume141. Edited by: Ali MA. NATO Advanced Study Institute; 1987:323-351.

    Return to text

36. Scholtz G: The formation, differentiation and segmentation of the post-naupliar germ band of the amphipod Gammarus pulex (L.) (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida).

    Proc R Soc London B 1990, 239:163-211.

    Return to text

37. Scholtz G, Patel NH, Dohle W: Serially homologous engrailed stripes are generated via different cell lineages in the germ band of amphipod crustaceans (Malacostraca, Peracarida).

    Int J Dev Biol 1994, 38:471-478. PubMed Abstract |

    Return to text

38. Schnabel R, Hutter H, Moerman D, Schnabel H: Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using a 4D microscope: Variability of development and regional specification.

    Dev Biol 1997, 184(2):234-265. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

39. Wolff C, Scholtz G: Cell lineage, axis formation, and the origin of germ layers in the amphipod crustacean Orchestia cavimana.

    Dev Biol 2002, 250:44-58. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

40. Gerberding M, Scholtz G: Cell lineage of the midline cells in the amphipod crustacean Orchestia cavimana (Crustacea, Malacostraca) during formation and separation of the germ band.

    Dev Genes Evol 1999, 209(2):91-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

41. Gerberding M, Scholtz G: Neurons and glia in the midline of the higher crustacean Orchestia cavimana are generated via an invariant cell lineage that comprises a median neuroblast and glial progenitors.

    Dev Biol 2001, 235:397-409. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

42. Dohle W, Gerberding M, Hejnol A, Scholtz G: Cell lineage, segment differentiation, and gene expression in Crustaceans.In Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Crustacea. Edited by: Scholtz G. Lisse , A.A.Balkema; 2004:95-133.

    Return to text

43. Dohle W, Scholtz G: Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: the discordance between genealogical and segmental borders.

    Development 1988, Suppl. 104:147-160.

    Return to text

44. Scholtz G: Evolution of the nauplius stage in malacostracan crustaceans.

    J Zool Syst Evol Res 2000, 38:175-187. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

45. Hejnol A, Schnabel R, Scholtz G: A 4D-microscopic analysis of the germ band in the isopod crustacean Porcellio scaber (Peracarida, Malacostraca) - developmental and phylogenetic implications.

    Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216:755-767. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

46. Hejnol A, Scholtz G: Clonal analysis of Distal-less and engrailed expression patterns during early morphogenesis of uniramous and biramous crustacean limbs.

    Dev Genes Evol 2004, 214(10):473-485. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

47. Popadic A, Abzhanov A, Rusch D, Kaufman TC: Understanding the genetic basis of morphological evolution: the role of homeotic genes in the diversification of the arthropod bauplan.

    Int J Dev Biol 1998, 42:453-461. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

48. Rogers BT, Peterson MD, Kaufman TC: The development and evolution of insect mouthparts as revealed by the expression patterns of gnathocephalic genes.

    Evol Dev 2002, 4(2):96–110. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

49. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC: Exploring myriapod body plan: Expression patterns of the Hox genes in a centipede.

    Development 2002, 129:1125-1238.

    Return to text

50. Janssen R, Damen WGM: The ten Hox genes of the millipede Glomeris marginata.

    Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216:451-465. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

51. Manton SM: On the embryology of a mysid crustacean, Hemimysis lamornae.

    Phil Trans R Soc London 1928, 216:363-463.

    Return to text

52. Manton SM: On the embryology of the crustacean Nebalia bipes.

    Phil Trans R Soc London B 1934, 498(223):163-238.

    Return to text

53. Moeller OS, Olesen J, Hoeg JT: On the larval development of Eubranchipus grubii (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Anostraca), with notes on the basal phylogeny of the Branchiopoda.

    Zoomorphology 2004, 123:107-123. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

54. Olesen J, Walossek D: Limb ontogeny and trunk segmentation in Nebalia bipes (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Leptostraca).

    Zoomorphology 2000, 120:47-64. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

55. Olesen J, Richter S, Scholtz G: On the ontogeny of Leptodora kindtii (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Cladocera), with notes on the phylogeny of the Cladocera.

    J Morph 2003, 256:235-259. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

56. Stein M, Waloszek D, Maas A: Oelandocaris oelandica and the stem lineage of Crustacea.In Crustacea and arthropod relationships. Edited by: Koenemann S, Jenner RA. Boca Raton , CRC; Taylor & Francis; 2005:55-71.

    Return to text

57. Heymons R: Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender.

    Zoologica 1901, 33:1-244.

    Return to text

58. Bruckmoser P: Embryologische Untersuchungen über den Kopfbau der Collembole Orchesella villosa L.

    Zool Jb Anat 1965, 82:299-364.

    Return to text

59. Philiptschenko J: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Apterygoten. III. Die Embryonalentwicklung von Isostoma cinerea Nic.

    Z wiss Zool 1912, 53:519-660 plus Tafeln X-XIV.

    Return to text

60. Silvestri F: Sulle appendici del capo degli "Japygidae" (Thysanura Entrophaga) e rispettivo confronto con quelle dei Chilopodi, dei Diplopodi e dei Crostacei: Paris. ; 1933:329-343.

    Return to text

61. Larink O: Die Kopfentwicklung von Lepisma saccharina L. (Insecta, Thysanura).

    Z Morph Tiere 1970, 67:1-15.

    Return to text

62. Scholl G: Die Embryonalentwicklung des Kopfes und Prothorax von Carausius morosus Br. (Insecta, Phasmida).

    Z Morph Tiere 1969, 65:1-142. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

63. Ibrahim MM: Grundzüge der Organbildung im Embryo von Tachycines (Insecta, Saltatoria).

    Zool Jb Anat 1958, 76:541-594.

    Return to text

64. Koch M, Edgecombe GD: Peristomatic structures in Scutigeromorpha (Chilopoda): a comparative study, with new characters for higher-level systematics.

    Zoomorphology 2006, 125:187-207. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

65. Haget A: Recherches expérimentales sur l'origine embryonnaire du crâne d'un Coléoptère: le Doryphore (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say).

    Bull Soc Zool France 1957, 82:269-295.

    Return to text

66. Wada S: Analyse der Kopf-Hals-Region von Tachycines (Saltatoria) in morphogenetische Einheiten. 2. Mitteilung: Experimentell-teratologischer Befund am Kopfskelett mit Berücksichtigung des zentralen Nervensystems.

    Zool Jb Anat 1966, 83:235-326.

    Return to text

67. Jürgens G, Hartenstein V: The terminal regions of the body pattern.In The Development of Drosphila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993.

    Return to text

68. Snodgrass RE: Evolution of arthropod mechanism.

    Smithson Misc Coll 1958, 138(2):1-77.

    Return to text

69. Scholtz G: Homology and ontogeny: Pattern and process in comparative developmental biology.

    Theor Biosci 2005, 124:121-143. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

70. Damen WGM, Hausdorf M, Seyfarth EA, Tautz D: A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:10665-10670. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text |

    Return to text

71. Mittmann B, Scholtz G: Development of the nervous system in the "head" of Limulus polyphemus (Chelicerata: Xiphosura): morphological evidence for a correspondence between the segments of the chelicerae and and of the (first) antennae of Mandibulata.

    Dev Genes Evol 2003, 1(213):9-17.

    Return to text

72. Telford MJ, Thomas RH: Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:10671–10675. Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

73. Edgecombe GD, Richter S, Wilson GDF: The mandibular gnathal edges: Homologous structures throughout Mandibulata.

    Afr Invert 2003, 44:115-135.

    Return to text

74. Harzsch S, Müller CHG, Wolf H: From variable to constant cell numbers: cellular characteristics of the arthropod nervous system argue against a sister-group relationship of Chelicerata and “Myriapoda” but favour the Mandibulata concept.

    Dev Genes Evol 2005, 215:53-68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

75. Giribet G, Richter S, Edgecombe GD, Wheeler WC: The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda - Evidence from nine loci and morphology.In Crustacea and arthropod relationships. Edited by: Koenemann S, Jenner RA. Boca Raton , CRC; Taylor & Francis; 2005.

    Return to text

76. Cook CE, Smith ML, Telford MJ, Bastianello A, Akam M: Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods.

    Curr Biol 2001, 11:759-763. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

77. Hwang UW, Friedrich M, Tautz D, Park CJ, Kim W: Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates.

    Nature 2001, 413:154-157. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text

78. Mallatt JM, Garey JR, Shultz JW: Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: First use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA to classify the arthropods and their kin.

    Mol Phylogenet Evol 2004, 31:178-191. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |

    Return to text